Difference between revisions of "Talk:Homosexual behavior in animals"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(you wanna do the heavy lifting?)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
:Should this article redirect to [[Homosexuality in Animals Myth]]? [[User:AlbertW|AlbertW]] 14:10, 25 November 2008 (EST)
 
:Should this article redirect to [[Homosexuality in Animals Myth]]? [[User:AlbertW|AlbertW]] 14:10, 25 November 2008 (EST)
 +
::After a merge, sure, why not? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 19:19, 25 November 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 00:19, November 26, 2008

The article I cited confuses companionship with mating. This reminds me of one of the most typical of "gay rights" arguments, which likewise confuses sex with affection or sex with friendship. "What's wrong with two men loving each other?" Nothing, of course, but what's wrong with a parent "loving" his child in the same way that a heterosexual couple love each other?

All agree (with one notable exception) that incest is not justified by claims of "love". --Ed Poor Talk 13:25, 25 November 2008 (EST)

Should this article redirect to Homosexuality in Animals Myth? AlbertW 14:10, 25 November 2008 (EST)
After a merge, sure, why not? --Ed Poor Talk 19:19, 25 November 2008 (EST)