Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:Obama straw poll"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
RodWeathers (talk | contribs) (→Admin only?: new section) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Can I ask why this is the case? It doesn't seem particularly democratic if enfranchisement is restricted. Be wary if you start [[American Revolution|taxing me]]! [[User:RodWeathers|- Rod Weathers]] 11:40, 27 November 2008 (EST) | Can I ask why this is the case? It doesn't seem particularly democratic if enfranchisement is restricted. Be wary if you start [[American Revolution|taxing me]]! [[User:RodWeathers|- Rod Weathers]] 11:40, 27 November 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | *Because inclusive discussion has so far failed to net any agreement, see [[talk:Barack Obama]] --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] <small>(CPAdmin1)</small><sup>[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]</sup> <sup>[[User:CPAdmin1/Polls|Vote in my NEW polls]]</sup> 11:42, 27 November 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 16:42, November 27, 2008
We should probably divide it up into several issues. --Tim (CPAdmin1)talk Vote in my NEW polls 11:31, 27 November 2008 (EST)
- Two that come to mind are religion and birthplace. --Ed Poor Talk 11:38, 27 November 2008 (EST)
- The number of his gaffes. --MugiK 11:39, 27 November 2008 (EST)
Admin only?
Can I ask why this is the case? It doesn't seem particularly democratic if enfranchisement is restricted. Be wary if you start taxing me! - Rod Weathers 11:40, 27 November 2008 (EST)
- Because inclusive discussion has so far failed to net any agreement, see talk:Barack Obama --Tim (CPAdmin1)talk Vote in my NEW polls 11:42, 27 November 2008 (EST)