Difference between revisions of "Cook v. Gralike"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Undo revision 515455 by Pweeee (Talk))
Line 1: Line 1:
−
In '''''Cook v. Gralike''''', 531 U.S. 510 (2001), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] invalidated under the [[U.S. Constitution]] a provision in the [[Missouri]] Constitution requiring indication on the ballot of whether congressional candidates declined to support a term limits amendment to the [[U.S. Constitution]].  Justice [[John Paul Stevens]], writing for the court, stated that this law was not a permissible exercise of the state's power to regulate the time, place, and manner of holding elections for [[federal]] offices.
+
l0l dis wiki r dum looooooooool
  
−
This expanded the holding in ''[[U.S. Term Limits v. Thornton]]''.  Surprisingly, Justice [[Antonin Scalia]] joined Justice Stevens majority opinion, but the other Justices who expressed different views in ''U.S. Term Limits'' continued to differ from Justice Stevens on the same or new grounds.
+
GOD DOES NOT EXIST
−
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
+
CONSERVATIVES ARE DUMB
 +
 
 +
<!-- This wiki is dumb lol. God doesnt exist, and you guys are dumb -->

Revision as of 20:20, November 27, 2008

l0l dis wiki r dum looooooooool

GOD DOES NOT EXIST CONSERVATIVES ARE DUMB