Difference between revisions of "Talk:Paradise Lost"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: Paradise Lost is not by Dante. It is a different book, covering the Fall of Satan and the Fall of Man, by John Milton. It probably deserves a page to itself.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Paradise Lost is not by Dante. It is a different book, covering the Fall of Satan and the Fall of Man, by John Milton. It probably deserves a page to itself.
+
Paradise Lost is not by Dante. It is a different book, covering the Fall of Satan and the Fall of Man, by John Milton. It probably deserves a page to itself. {{unsigned|Jim245}}
 +
:Agreed - I've changed the redirect to a stub. Unfortunately, despite having tried to read Paradise Lost many years ago, I feel it is way outside of my area of expertise to write more than a stub article. [[User:Davidklein|Davidklein]] 09:17, 28 November 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 14:17, November 28, 2008

Paradise Lost is not by Dante. It is a different book, covering the Fall of Satan and the Fall of Man, by John Milton. It probably deserves a page to itself. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jim245 (talk)

Agreed - I've changed the redirect to a stub. Unfortunately, despite having tried to read Paradise Lost many years ago, I feel it is way outside of my area of expertise to write more than a stub article. Davidklein 09:17, 28 November 2008 (EST)