Difference between revisions of "Talk:Table sugar"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:And while I'm on the subject, I am inclined to agree.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 08:19, 30 November 2008 (EST) | :And while I'm on the subject, I am inclined to agree.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 08:19, 30 November 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | ::Thanks Terry. The term was new to me. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 08:21, 30 November 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 13:21, November 30, 2008
Why is this 'table sugar' rather than just 'sugar'? Bugler 08:13, 30 November 2008 (EST)
- I can guess why. The substance known as "table sugar" is specifically sucrose, and more specifically refined sucrose. "Sugar" is a generic term that can include any mono- or disaccharide. (A polysaccharide is one of three things: "starch", "cellulose", or glycogen.)
- I would also surmise that the editor is trying to make a point that refined sugar added at table, or even used in cooking, is deleterious to a person's health in ways that only recently anyone has thought of.