"However, it (Lysenkoism) was disproven by genetics, not Darwinian evolution, as evolutionists like to claim."
"However, it (Lysenkoism) was disproven by genetics, not Darwinian evolution, as evolutionists like to claim."
−
Your statement insinuates genetics being at odds with Darwisnism. I could as well say: "Lysenkoism was disproven by genetics, not Creationism, as creationists like to claim." What you actually mean is that Lysenkoism being scientifically disproven does not necessarily prove Darwinism to be right.
+
Your statement falsely insinuates genetics being at odds with Darwisnism. I could as well say: "Lysenkoism was disproven by genetics, not Creationism, as creationists like to claim." What you actually mean is that Lysenkoism being scientifically disproven does not necessarily prove Darwinism to be right.