Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ballotechnics"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Uncle Ed cracks the whip) |
(Reply, and I remembered to sign it for once!) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Writing the next sentence in the article takes less work than tagging it as a stub + defending the tag. Back to work, you! ;-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:24, 2 December 2008 (EST) | :Writing the next sentence in the article takes less work than tagging it as a stub + defending the tag. Back to work, you! ;-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:24, 2 December 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | ::I don't know anything about Ballotechnics and so I am unable to write about it. Adding a stub makes it easier for other editors who are looking for work to do and who may have more expertise to find articles that need expanding. I thought that was the point?--[[User:JohnD|JohnD]] 14:27, 2 December 2008 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:27, December 2, 2008
Stubs
Hi Ed, I see you've removed a couple of Stubs I've put on things. I'm unsure ow they are meant to be used. Could you explain it for me? Thanks.--JohnD 14:20, 2 December 2008 (EST)
- Writing the next sentence in the article takes less work than tagging it as a stub + defending the tag. Back to work, you! ;-) --Ed Poor Talk 14:24, 2 December 2008 (EST)
- I don't know anything about Ballotechnics and so I am unable to write about it. Adding a stub makes it easier for other editors who are looking for work to do and who may have more expertise to find articles that need expanding. I thought that was the point?--JohnD 14:27, 2 December 2008 (EST)