Difference between revisions of "Talk:Trail of Tears"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Red China: ten times worse than Hitler vs. the Jews) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
There was the [[Holocaust]]. There were the [[Stalin]]ist labour camps. There were the killling fields in Cambodia. [[User:RubyG|RubyG]] 13:04, 3 December 2008 (EST) | There was the [[Holocaust]]. There were the [[Stalin]]ist labour camps. There were the killling fields in Cambodia. [[User:RubyG|RubyG]] 13:04, 3 December 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Don't forget all the people murdered by [[Mao]], estimated at 20 million (current Chinese gov't admission) to 60 million (source needed). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:08, 3 December 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 18:08, December 3, 2008
Genocide
The Trail of Tears should be considered genocide based on the references in Conservapedia's own article on the subject. The conditions of the Trail of Tears clearly meets the conditions of items 2 and three in Article 2 of the Geneva Convention, as cited in the article. --DinsdaleP 12:43, 3 December 2008 (EST)
- I support this only on the condition that you help us identify the mega-cases of genocide by regimes that have nothing to do with America, such as the Soviets and Red China. Do not call excessive attention to (relatively) small violations of human rights. This would violate our undue weight provision, if we had one. --Ed Poor Talk 13:00, 3 December 2008 (EST)
There was the Holocaust. There were the Stalinist labour camps. There were the killling fields in Cambodia. RubyG 13:04, 3 December 2008 (EST)