Difference between revisions of "Talk:Priesthood of all believers"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(next, i will add postive description per suggestion.)
(++comment)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
So far, this page doesn't really tell about the Priesthood of all believers-- only the catholic, anglican, and orthodox alternatives. --[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] <sub>[[User Talk:BenjaminS|Talk]]</sub> 11:00, 3 December 2008 (EST)
 
So far, this page doesn't really tell about the Priesthood of all believers-- only the catholic, anglican, and orthodox alternatives. --[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] <sub>[[User Talk:BenjaminS|Talk]]</sub> 11:00, 3 December 2008 (EST)
 
*Agreed. it was easier for me to try and define this doctrine in terms of ''what's it's not''. next, i will start a positive description per your suggestion. --[[User:RickD|RickD]] 11:45, 3 December 2008 (EST)
 
*Agreed. it was easier for me to try and define this doctrine in terms of ''what's it's not''. next, i will start a positive description per your suggestion. --[[User:RickD|RickD]] 11:45, 3 December 2008 (EST)
 +
::After some thought, I must admit that a proper positive defintion requires more knowledge of certain elements of Christianity than I so far possess.  As a Christian, I should understand these elements and expect to. When ''and if'' I do, I'll write more. (Trying to write something positive here has forced me to admit to myself certain gaps in my knowledge of Christianity).  --[[User:RickD|RickD]] 16:58, 3 December 2008 (EST)

Latest revision as of 21:58, December 3, 2008

So far, this page doesn't really tell about the Priesthood of all believers-- only the catholic, anglican, and orthodox alternatives. --Ben Talk 11:00, 3 December 2008 (EST)

  • Agreed. it was easier for me to try and define this doctrine in terms of what's it's not. next, i will start a positive description per your suggestion. --RickD 11:45, 3 December 2008 (EST)
After some thought, I must admit that a proper positive defintion requires more knowledge of certain elements of Christianity than I so far possess. As a Christian, I should understand these elements and expect to. When and if I do, I'll write more. (Trying to write something positive here has forced me to admit to myself certain gaps in my knowledge of Christianity). --RickD 16:58, 3 December 2008 (EST)