Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:Copying"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
==Do not know which heading to put it under==
 
==Do not know which heading to put it under==
−
*[[Siberian tiger]], copied from more than one source, including:
 
−
::PBS (no explicit copyright notice), http://www.pbs.org/kratts/world/eurasia/tiger/index.html
 
−
::Wikipedia, GFDL, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amur_Tiger
 
  
 
==Copied from a website that posts an explicit copyright notice==
 
==Copied from a website that posts an explicit copyright notice==

Revision as of 20:18, March 22, 2007

Use this page to note of articles that appear to have been copied from other sources, or that appear to have made use of large amounts (more than a paragraph) from other sources.

Because Conservapedia's policies on copying are not yet clear, and are not obvious to users, most of these entries will have been made in good faith by users who are trying to help Conservapedia.

If you can tell, put the material under the proper heading.

I don't think there's any rush to do anything in particular about these until it's clear what the policy is. Dpbsmith 14:01, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

Do not know which heading to put it under

Copied from a website that posts an explicit copyright notice

Copied from a website that does not have any conspicuous copyright or licensing notice

Copied from a website that uses a "free license" like GFDL or Creative Commons

Copied from a source that is probably public domain