Difference between revisions of "Talk:Barney Frank"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I'd rather leave the chaos of contribution to those with the paitience of saints and the clout to not have their contributions edited and reverted beyond any semblence of the original point. [[User:Jros83|Jros83]] 23:23, 6 October 2008 (EDT) | I'd rather leave the chaos of contribution to those with the paitience of saints and the clout to not have their contributions edited and reverted beyond any semblence of the original point. [[User:Jros83|Jros83]] 23:23, 6 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Considering Frank has by now long been openly gay, and has since been easily reelected multiple times, the remark that he "only revealed his homosexual proclivities" after his election seems a litle pointless, as if he was deceiving the voters to get elected. He is now openly gay, and continues to be reelected. [[User:CBrown|CBrown]] 7 December 2008 | ||
Revision as of 15:47, December 7, 2008
so that's all there is to barney frank...? Jros83 21:24, 5 October 2008 (EDT)
- Nothing's preventing you from adding something instead of making remarks like that. -Foxtrot 23:22, 5 October 2008 (EDT)
I'd rather leave the chaos of contribution to those with the paitience of saints and the clout to not have their contributions edited and reverted beyond any semblence of the original point. Jros83 23:23, 6 October 2008 (EDT)
Considering Frank has by now long been openly gay, and has since been easily reelected multiple times, the remark that he "only revealed his homosexual proclivities" after his election seems a litle pointless, as if he was deceiving the voters to get elected. He is now openly gay, and continues to be reelected. CBrown 7 December 2008