Difference between revisions of "Talk:Time"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ThomasGerbil (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Actually, [http://www.newscientist.com/channel/fundamentals/mg19726391.500-is-time-an-illusion.html it doesn't exist at all] I say we delete the whole article. --[[User:ThomasGerbil|ThomasGerbil]] 23:20, 29 January 2008 (EST) | :Actually, [http://www.newscientist.com/channel/fundamentals/mg19726391.500-is-time-an-illusion.html it doesn't exist at all] I say we delete the whole article. --[[User:ThomasGerbil|ThomasGerbil]] 23:20, 29 January 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | It seems odd that the legal definition takes up so much space. It would give a student a misleading impression of its importance relative to the concept as a whole. I will fix this once I compose a better definition. [[User:GloriaL|GloriaL]] 14:38, 7 December 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 19:38, December 7, 2008
Um, no, actually. Time is a TEMPORAL dimension. The fourth dimension is the fourth SPATIAL dimension. See Wikipedia for more information.
How can time be both an abstract concept and a dimension of reality? Dadsnagem2 15:15, 16 January 2008 (EST)
- Actually, it doesn't exist at all I say we delete the whole article. --ThomasGerbil 23:20, 29 January 2008 (EST)
It seems odd that the legal definition takes up so much space. It would give a student a misleading impression of its importance relative to the concept as a whole. I will fix this once I compose a better definition. GloriaL 14:38, 7 December 2008 (EST)