Difference between revisions of "Talk:Time"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
It seems odd that the legal definition takes up so much space. It would give a student a misleading impression of its importance relative to the concept as a whole. I will fix this once I compose a better definition. [[User:GloriaL|GloriaL]] 14:38, 7 December 2008 (EST) | It seems odd that the legal definition takes up so much space. It would give a student a misleading impression of its importance relative to the concept as a whole. I will fix this once I compose a better definition. [[User:GloriaL|GloriaL]] 14:38, 7 December 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Please don't remove the legal definition, but feel free to add more to the "actual" definition. Thanks. --[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] <sub>[[User Talk:BenjaminS|Talk]]</sub> 14:41, 7 December 2008 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:41, December 7, 2008
Um, no, actually. Time is a TEMPORAL dimension. The fourth dimension is the fourth SPATIAL dimension. See Wikipedia for more information.
How can time be both an abstract concept and a dimension of reality? Dadsnagem2 15:15, 16 January 2008 (EST)
- Actually, it doesn't exist at all I say we delete the whole article. --ThomasGerbil 23:20, 29 January 2008 (EST)
It seems odd that the legal definition takes up so much space. It would give a student a misleading impression of its importance relative to the concept as a whole. I will fix this once I compose a better definition. GloriaL 14:38, 7 December 2008 (EST)
Please don't remove the legal definition, but feel free to add more to the "actual" definition. Thanks. --Ben Talk 14:41, 7 December 2008 (EST)