Changes

So how would one go about "falsifying" this theory?
Line 96: Line 96:     
I truly enjoy debating with you, Mr. Rayment, as your thoughts are always well-reasoned and thought-out, but I am afraid "real-world" matters will be occupying my time for a while. Hopefully, I will soon be able to continue, and I look forward to it.--[[User:Thinker|Thinker]] 11:09, 26 October 2008 (EDT)
 
I truly enjoy debating with you, Mr. Rayment, as your thoughts are always well-reasoned and thought-out, but I am afraid "real-world" matters will be occupying my time for a while. Hopefully, I will soon be able to continue, and I look forward to it.--[[User:Thinker|Thinker]] 11:09, 26 October 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
: I have little doubt that if God was relating Truth just to us 21st-century people, He would do it in a different way.  But you seem to be assuming that He told it to people in a way that was specific to them, rather than in a general way that would be understandable by most people throughout history.  Clearly God intended His Word to be passed on down to others, so would know that it also needed to be understandable by us.  Of course He would also know that we would have the advantage of having some knowledge of ancient writing styles, etc.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 07:13, 27 October 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Testable propositions==
 +
 +
Please list several testable propositions, and explain how this would affect support for Creationism if any of them were shown to be false. Please take into consideration the [[standard of proof]] which various creationists would accept, particularly those in the [[Old Earth]] and [[Young Earth]] camps. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:25, 8 December 2008 (EST)
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits