Difference between revisions of "Talk:Particles (Japanese)"
(wa, ga, sounds like I just got elbowed in the tummy) |
|||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Are postpositions still called particles when they have two syllables? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:51, 8 December 2008 (EST) | Are postpositions still called particles when they have two syllables? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:51, 8 December 2008 (EST) | ||
lol. remember these are used by the same people who invented eating fish before they invented kitchens. --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''ohayougozaimasu'']]</sup> 14:11, 8 December 2008 (EST) | lol. remember these are used by the same people who invented eating fish before they invented kitchens. --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''ohayougozaimasu'']]</sup> 14:11, 8 December 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Those crucial distinctions== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thank you, Jessica, for [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Particles_(Japanese)&curid=81292&diff=584547&oldid=584541&rcid=637508 this distinction]. One of the hardest things for me, when I was studying Japanese, was to know how to choose between particles. Many times, they seemed equivalent, but I kept getting marked wrong on tests. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 06:51, 12 December 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 11:51, December 12, 2008
- Participles are always written in hiragana.
This wouldn't be true for a telegram written all in katakana. Ha ha, just being technical.
I think what you really meant is that kanji is never used for particles. This actually leads to a more general point: that there are some ideas which cannot be expressed with kanji alone. For example, the tense of verbs is expressed with kanji: like (write) + shimash'ta => written. --Ed Poor Talk 06:47, 8 December 2008 (EST)
Pronunciation
Any other idiosyncrasies besides wa and o? These are very likely to trip up the beginner, so I'd like to find a place to collect and highlight them. If you ever try to transliterate from kana to romaji (or vice versa) you would have to know about these particles. Do I write wa and say ha? Or vice versa? Let's help our readers (your students) be clear on this. --Ed Poor Talk 06:54, 8 December 2008 (EST)
- That is a good point - the only other one is "e", written as "he" (へ). We will have to keep a note of these little things as we go along, so we can tidy up the lose ends as we come across them. I will add notes for wa, o and e. --KotomiTohayougozaimasu 07:41, 8 December 2008 (EST)
Kana, kana?
Is it worth, do you think, adding the kana for each romaji example too, or will that over-complicate matters? --KotomiTohayougozaimasu 10:17, 8 December 2008 (EST)
- At this point, I wouldn't worry about adding kana to this article. At some later date, we might go through all your work and transliterate all your romaji examples into kana. I wrote a computer program in Javascript to help with that; I uploaded it to Wikipedia somewhere. But there's no hurry, and I'm sure someone else has better software for this. --Ed Poor Talk 10:22, 8 December 2008 (EST)
Number of syllables
Are postpositions still called particles when they have two syllables? --Ed Poor Talk 13:51, 8 December 2008 (EST) lol. remember these are used by the same people who invented eating fish before they invented kitchens. --KotomiTohayougozaimasu 14:11, 8 December 2008 (EST)
Those crucial distinctions
Thank you, Jessica, for this distinction. One of the hardest things for me, when I was studying Japanese, was to know how to choose between particles. Many times, they seemed equivalent, but I kept getting marked wrong on tests. --Ed Poor Talk 06:51, 12 December 2008 (EST)