Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tea"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: I strongly dispute the contention that my definition was conceived of in anything but the utmost veracity.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I strongly dispute the contention that my definition was conceived of in anything but the utmost veracity.
 
I strongly dispute the contention that my definition was conceived of in anything but the utmost veracity.
 +
 +
Didnt mean to imply it was a lie, just an inaccuracy.  Tea, and the psychoactive component caffeine, are not narcotics.  SOrry if I offended.[[User:Palmd001|Palmd001]] 19:44, 22 March 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 23:44, March 22, 2007

I strongly dispute the contention that my definition was conceived of in anything but the utmost veracity.

Didnt mean to imply it was a lie, just an inaccuracy. Tea, and the psychoactive component caffeine, are not narcotics. SOrry if I offended.Palmd001 19:44, 22 March 2007 (EDT)