Difference between revisions of "Talk:Miranda v. Arizona"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
RodWeathers (talk | contribs) (→Sorry AlexM!: new section) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: You're right. So I took it out. I look forward to seeing more insights from you. Welcome.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 13:33, 13 December 2008 (EST) | : You're right. So I took it out. I look forward to seeing more insights from you. Welcome.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 13:33, 13 December 2008 (EST) | ||
::The previous version was too strong but I rephrased it to get the point across. As a conservative, I see legitimate reasons to worry about Miranda, but I wouldn't call it a total societal collapse!-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 13:36, 13 December 2008 (EST) | ::The previous version was too strong but I rephrased it to get the point across. As a conservative, I see legitimate reasons to worry about Miranda, but I wouldn't call it a total societal collapse!-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 13:36, 13 December 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Sorry AlexM! == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I hit undo on the wrong page. My apologies. [[User:RodWeathers|- Rod Weathers]] 13:48, 13 December 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 18:48, December 13, 2008
Woah. "The total collapse of society"? That needs a citation desperately. Extraordinary statements require extraordinary support.- RReynald
- You're right. So I took it out. I look forward to seeing more insights from you. Welcome.--aschlafly 13:33, 13 December 2008 (EST)
- The previous version was too strong but I rephrased it to get the point across. As a conservative, I see legitimate reasons to worry about Miranda, but I wouldn't call it a total societal collapse!-AlexanderM 13:36, 13 December 2008 (EST)
Sorry AlexM!
I hit undo on the wrong page. My apologies. - Rod Weathers 13:48, 13 December 2008 (EST)