Difference between revisions of "Talk:Homo sapiens"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Conservateur (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
-Gasmonkey | -Gasmonkey | ||
| + | :Well according to this site [http://www.antarctica.org/old/UK/Envirn/pag/antar_history/pag/science1.htm#science||Antarctica.org] at least one baby was conceived and born there. [[User:Sulgran|Sulgran]] 04:22, 23 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
== Two Homo sapiens articles == | == Two Homo sapiens articles == | ||
There are two separate articles on this subject, [[Homo Sapiens]] and [[Homo sapiens]]. The lower case sapiens is the correct form, so we should merge the other one here.--[[User:Conservateur|Conservateur]] 01:45, 21 March 2007 (EDT) | There are two separate articles on this subject, [[Homo Sapiens]] and [[Homo sapiens]]. The lower case sapiens is the correct form, so we should merge the other one here.--[[User:Conservateur|Conservateur]] 01:45, 21 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 08:22, March 23, 2007
Creationist View?
Can we add the creationist view on "Homo Sapiens?"
- Yes, but keep it neutral.--Elamdri 19:48, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
Antarctica
There are permanent bases on Antarctica. Wouldn't that mean we inhabit all seven continents? --Dave3172 10:53, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
Not really according to most geographers I have talked to. Usually inhabiting means having people living there all thi time in the form of family units, towns, cities and the like. -Gasmonkey
- Well according to this site [1] at least one baby was conceived and born there. Sulgran 04:22, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
Two Homo sapiens articles
There are two separate articles on this subject, Homo Sapiens and Homo sapiens. The lower case sapiens is the correct form, so we should merge the other one here.--Conservateur 01:45, 21 March 2007 (EDT)