Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sulu"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Homosexuality: new section) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::You surmised correctly, Philip. I agree, as a compromise, a single linked page to the Star Trek main article, detailing the characters. Perhaps detailing the main characters of all three Star Trek series. And I also agree with your suggestion about putting the religion discussion onto its own, linked page. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk!]]</sup> 19:07, 29 December 2008 (EST) | ::You surmised correctly, Philip. I agree, as a compromise, a single linked page to the Star Trek main article, detailing the characters. Perhaps detailing the main characters of all three Star Trek series. And I also agree with your suggestion about putting the religion discussion onto its own, linked page. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk!]]</sup> 19:07, 29 December 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Homosexuality == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I can't find the rule right now, and perhaps we have never adequately documented it (so the following may not be the ''exact'' criteria), but we don't include information such as a person being homosexual unless ''both'' of the following criteria are satisfied: | ||
| + | * That their homosexuality is certain. | ||
| + | * That their homosexuality is a defining aspect of their life, such as them being a homosexual activist. | ||
| + | As far as I'm aware, the second of these points at least is not the case here, which is why I've reverted the claim a second time. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 19:47, 29 December 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 00:47, December 30, 2008
Suggestion
With all respect to the original author, I am wondering if this page should be included into the existing Star Trek page? --₮K/Talk! 18:24, 29 December 2008 (EST)
- You don't explain why, so I'll assume that it's to avoid lots of small articles about individual characters?
- I don't agree with it being on the Star Trek page. Conservapedia wants concise articles, and the Star Trek article is already a fair size (in fact I think the religion section should be removed to a separate article).
- I support this article staying, but an alternative is to have a single article covering all the main characters ("Star Trek characters", "Characters of Star Trek"?) rather than separate articles for each.
- Philip J. Rayment 18:58, 29 December 2008 (EST)
- You surmised correctly, Philip. I agree, as a compromise, a single linked page to the Star Trek main article, detailing the characters. Perhaps detailing the main characters of all three Star Trek series. And I also agree with your suggestion about putting the religion discussion onto its own, linked page. --₮K/Talk! 19:07, 29 December 2008 (EST)
Homosexuality
I can't find the rule right now, and perhaps we have never adequately documented it (so the following may not be the exact criteria), but we don't include information such as a person being homosexual unless both of the following criteria are satisfied:
- That their homosexuality is certain.
- That their homosexuality is a defining aspect of their life, such as them being a homosexual activist.
As far as I'm aware, the second of these points at least is not the case here, which is why I've reverted the claim a second time.
Philip J. Rayment 19:47, 29 December 2008 (EST)