Difference between revisions of "Talk:Human evolution"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: I'm not sure evolution of man has been "thoroughly disproven". I'm not saying it is true, I'm saying the page is inacurate. Perhaps a re-write? User:AddisonDM 28 December 2008) |
RodWeathers (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm not sure evolution of man has been "thoroughly disproven". I'm not saying it is true, I'm saying the page is inacurate. Perhaps a re-write? [[User:AddisonDM]] 28 December 2008 | I'm not sure evolution of man has been "thoroughly disproven". I'm not saying it is true, I'm saying the page is inacurate. Perhaps a re-write? [[User:AddisonDM]] 28 December 2008 | ||
| + | :"Thoroughly disproven" is perfectly accurate. See [[Counterexamples to Evolution]] for a ''very'' brief list. [[User:RodWeathers|- Rod Weathers]] 20:17, 29 December 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 01:17, December 30, 2008
I'm not sure evolution of man has been "thoroughly disproven". I'm not saying it is true, I'm saying the page is inacurate. Perhaps a re-write? User:AddisonDM 28 December 2008
- "Thoroughly disproven" is perfectly accurate. See Counterexamples to Evolution for a very brief list. - Rod Weathers 20:17, 29 December 2008 (EST)