Difference between revisions of "Talk:Human evolution"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
RodWeathers (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm not sure evolution of man has been "thoroughly disproven". I'm not saying it is true, I'm saying the page is inacurate. Perhaps a re-write? [[User:AddisonDM]] 28 December 2008 | I'm not sure evolution of man has been "thoroughly disproven". I'm not saying it is true, I'm saying the page is inacurate. Perhaps a re-write? [[User:AddisonDM]] 28 December 2008 | ||
:"Thoroughly disproven" is perfectly accurate. See [[Counterexamples to Evolution]] for a ''very'' brief list. [[User:RodWeathers|- Rod Weathers]] 20:17, 29 December 2008 (EST) | :"Thoroughly disproven" is perfectly accurate. See [[Counterexamples to Evolution]] for a ''very'' brief list. [[User:RodWeathers|- Rod Weathers]] 20:17, 29 December 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | That is a good list. Okay. [[User:AddisonDM]] 29 December 2008 | ||
Revision as of 04:11, December 30, 2008
I'm not sure evolution of man has been "thoroughly disproven". I'm not saying it is true, I'm saying the page is inacurate. Perhaps a re-write? User:AddisonDM 28 December 2008
- "Thoroughly disproven" is perfectly accurate. See Counterexamples to Evolution for a very brief list. - Rod Weathers 20:17, 29 December 2008 (EST)
That is a good list. Okay. User:AddisonDM 29 December 2008