Difference between revisions of "User talk:Gays r people"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(a)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
::::The user name implies that we think that gays "r" not people.--[[User:CPAdmin1|CPAdmin1]] 10:35, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
 
::::The user name implies that we think that gays "r" not people.--[[User:CPAdmin1|CPAdmin1]] 10:35, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::::Does it?  I don't think that logically follows.  -[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 10:36, 23 March 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 14:36, March 23, 2007

I can't agree with blocking this username. I don't think it's per se offensive or against the site's intent, unless bigotry is the site's intent.--AmesG 10:25, 23 March 2007 (EDT)

I didn't impose the block, but I completely support it. The user name is inappropriate--Aschlafly 10:29, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
When I made the block I was torn because though the name is inappropriate, it could have been a serious user. I couldn't figure out how to block the username but not the IP. Is there any way to do that? Might be useful to know for future reference.NSmyth 10:32, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
If you uncheck the box that says block account creation from this IP or something like that. --CPAdmin1 10:35, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
What makes it inappropriate? Let's say what we mean, and mean what we say. But not blocking the IP is a super idea. -AmesG 10:33, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
The user name implies that we think that gays "r" not people.--CPAdmin1 10:35, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
Does it? I don't think that logically follows. -AmesG 10:36, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Gays_r_people&oldid=59756"