Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nylon-eating bacteria"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:::If someone has a link to a discussion from an ID perspective I will try.... [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 13:31, 23 March 2007 (EDT) | :::If someone has a link to a discussion from an ID perspective I will try.... [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 13:31, 23 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| − | ::::Here ya go. Have fun... [http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v17/i3/bacteria.asp] | + | ::::Here ya go. Have fun... [http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v17/i3/bacteria.asp]--[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 13:35, 23 March 2007 (EDT) |
Revision as of 17:35, March 23, 2007
- "The latter claim that the plasmids in the bacteria allow for it to adapt to different food sources, and that this is an irreducibly complex feature"
Which would simply prove that IC features can evolve. Is there a creationist response to this experiment which isn't actually self-defeating? Tsumetai 12:55, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
- Whoever put that in....do they even know what the heck a plasmid is??? It makes ZERO sense to anyone with a shred of knowledge in biology Tmtoulouse 13:09, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
- I know. I was trying to get the gist across, but I am admittedly a bad person to try and push an ID argument. Maybe someone else has a different argument that supports their claim more forcefully? Also, I was just trying to put something in here that didn't make the claim that the bacteria sat around dormant until the invention of nylon. Any biologist that can make better sense of this is more than welcome to fix what I wrote.--Dave3172 13:14, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
- If someone has a link to a discussion from an ID perspective I will try.... Tmtoulouse 13:31, 23 March 2007 (EDT)