Difference between revisions of "Talk:Squid"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
DunsScotus (talk | contribs) |
Tmtoulouse (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::This article explains that overfishing is largely fictious, and that secularist scientists even find harm in bass fishing! [http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn6332] [[User:DunsScotus|DunsScotus]] 14:50, 23 March 2007 (EDT) | :::This article explains that overfishing is largely fictious, and that secularist scientists even find harm in bass fishing! [http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn6332] [[User:DunsScotus|DunsScotus]] 14:50, 23 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::Sure it does. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 14:51, 23 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:51, March 23, 2007
overfishing and other secularist/environmental lies are incompatible with a scriptural understanding of the world. DunsScotus 14:39, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
- Troll. Tmtoulouse 14:40, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
- Methinks though art to good to be true Mr Scotus.--British_cons (talk) 14:44, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
- I find this extremely offensive that expressing Conservative opinions on Conservapedia is somehow not acceptable. DunsScotus 14:45, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
- This article explains that overfishing is largely fictious, and that secularist scientists even find harm in bass fishing! [1] DunsScotus 14:50, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
- Sure it does. Tmtoulouse 14:51, 23 March 2007 (EDT)