Difference between revisions of "Talk:Squid"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
DunsScotus (talk | contribs) |
Tmtoulouse (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
: Gentlemen, you are too kind. It seems, also, that overfishing is based in governmental regulations and failure to endorse appropriate market reforms. [http://commonsblog.org/archives/cat_tragedy_of_the_commons.php] An appropriately capitalist fishery setting would not be having depletion problems, and that's well aligned with God's vision of personal ownership and husbandry over the natural world. [[User:DunsScotus|DunsScotus]] 14:58, 23 March 2007 (EDT) | : Gentlemen, you are too kind. It seems, also, that overfishing is based in governmental regulations and failure to endorse appropriate market reforms. [http://commonsblog.org/archives/cat_tragedy_of_the_commons.php] An appropriately capitalist fishery setting would not be having depletion problems, and that's well aligned with God's vision of personal ownership and husbandry over the natural world. [[User:DunsScotus|DunsScotus]] 14:58, 23 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Come to think of it I think the squids are pompous. Feel free to add whatever you want to this article! The truth has a nasty liberal bias that needs to be squelched. Particularly anything involving cephalopods! [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 15:00, 23 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:00, March 23, 2007
overfishing and other secularist/environmental lies are incompatible with a scriptural understanding of the world. DunsScotus 14:39, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
- Troll. Tmtoulouse 14:40, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
- Methinks though art to good to be true Mr Scotus.--British_cons (talk) 14:44, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
- I find this extremely offensive that expressing Conservative opinions on Conservapedia is somehow not acceptable. DunsScotus 14:45, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
- This article explains that overfishing is largely fictious, and that secularist scientists even find harm in bass fishing! [1] DunsScotus 14:50, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
- Sure it does. Tmtoulouse 14:51, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
- Actually it doesn't MR Scotus. I will follow your career here with interest. I'm sure that someone with your deep Christian insight and forthright conservative views will last a long time.--British_cons (talk) 14:54, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
- Sure it does. Tmtoulouse 14:51, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
- He represents the best. Tmtoulouse 14:56, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
- Gentlemen, you are too kind. It seems, also, that overfishing is based in governmental regulations and failure to endorse appropriate market reforms. [2] An appropriately capitalist fishery setting would not be having depletion problems, and that's well aligned with God's vision of personal ownership and husbandry over the natural world. DunsScotus 14:58, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
- Come to think of it I think the squids are pompous. Feel free to add whatever you want to this article! The truth has a nasty liberal bias that needs to be squelched. Particularly anything involving cephalopods! Tmtoulouse 15:00, 23 March 2007 (EDT)