Talk:Marriage

As far as I know, when they say "civil marriage," they mean the legal thing that may or may not be between a heterosexual couple (depending on where you live). It's a statement of fact, not opinion. Correct me if I'm wrong. --John 00:12, 16 March 2007 (EDT)

This is Conservapedia, where facts rule. John, if you want to throw in deeply false ideas (like the idea that a civil marriage can be between more than two people), they might like you in Wikipedia. In most states, civil unions are exclusively for a man and a woman! CEinhorn 01:23, 16 March 2007 (EDT)

This article doesn't take a strong enough stand on the position that Marriage is between a MAN and a WOMAN. (cf. The New York State Supreme Court's decision to ban gay 'marriages' in 2006. [1])

So be BOLD and edit it so that it is RIGHTeous! Tmtoulouse 15:05, 23 March 2007 (EDT)

Careful TM - he'll take you down with him.--British_cons (talk) 15:09, 23 March 2007 (EDT)

Nah, I am an integral part of the web of symbiosis between this site and reality. My presence would be missed too much. Tmtoulouse 15:11, 23 March 2007 (EDT)

No less a noted scholar as Stanley Kurtz has continually noted the importance of marriage as cement for our society, and also observed that the European dissolution of marriage has led (severally) to a) the hostile takeover of western civilization by Islamic immigrants b) growth of the welfare state c) massive expansion of children being aborted and raised out of wedlock by single mothers.[2] Furthermore, recognition of gay marriage is a trojan horse tactic leading inevitably to incest, recognition of multiple partners, and (probably) sanctioned bestiality, at least with larger mammals, like dogs. [3] DunsScotus 15:13, 23 March 2007 (EDT)