Difference between revisions of "User talk:Touchedbyabear"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
What was silly about it?  I knew an elephant that was 73, but the page said 70.  Im soory if you think that I am not being sincere. [[User:touchedbyabear|touchedbyabear]]
 
What was silly about it?  I knew an elephant that was 73, but the page said 70.  Im soory if you think that I am not being sincere. [[User:touchedbyabear|touchedbyabear]]
 +
 +
:70 is a good number to use because it has been rounded.  Note that the article states that an elephant may sometimes live longer. ~ [[User:SharonS|SharonS]] <sup>[[User talk:SharonS|Talk!]]</sup> 17:32, 23 March 2007 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 21:32, March 23, 2007

Your edit to the elephant page is silly and considered vandalism. Please do not make any more edits of the sort. ~ SharonS Talk! 17:21, 23 March 2007 (EDT)

What was silly about it? I knew an elephant that was 73, but the page said 70. Im soory if you think that I am not being sincere. touchedbyabear

70 is a good number to use because it has been rounded. Note that the article states that an elephant may sometimes live longer. ~ SharonS Talk! 17:32, 23 March 2007 (EDT)