Difference between revisions of "Scientific uncertainty"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(template jammed) |
(how science can get distorted) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
An article in ''[[Scientific American]]'' said: | An article in ''[[Scientific American]]'' said: | ||
| − | :Ambiguity requires interpretation. And interpretation is influenced by the individual’s point of view, which can become thoroughly entangled with the science. [http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=eating-made-simple Scientific American] | + | :[[Ambiguity]] requires interpretation. And [[interpretation]] is influenced by the individual’s [[point of view]], which can become thoroughly entangled with the [[science]]. [http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=eating-made-simple Scientific American] |
See: [[medical uncertainty]] | See: [[medical uncertainty]] | ||
Revision as of 23:48, January 9, 2009
An article in Scientific American said:
- Ambiguity requires interpretation. And interpretation is influenced by the individual’s point of view, which can become thoroughly entangled with the science. Scientific American
See: medical uncertainty