Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fascism"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Using "far-right" and "far-left" in reference to "state" in the first paragraph is not needed. And "far-left" makes no sense, since in the second paragraph Fascism is called the opposite of Communism, which is as far-left as you can get.--[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 23:56, 7 March 2007 (EST) | Using "far-right" and "far-left" in reference to "state" in the first paragraph is not needed. And "far-left" makes no sense, since in the second paragraph Fascism is called the opposite of Communism, which is as far-left as you can get.--[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 23:56, 7 March 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | It should be noted that Nazism is entirely different from Fascism. This article treats both terms as if they're synonymous. - [[User:Thjazi|Thjazi]] | ||
Revision as of 23:55, March 23, 2007
Is anybody paying attention to this article? A liberal recently posted information which labels Conservapedia as fascist! We need to keep an eye on articles such as this. Scorpionman 11:09, 7 March 2007 (EST)
Using "far-right" and "far-left" in reference to "state" in the first paragraph is not needed. And "far-left" makes no sense, since in the second paragraph Fascism is called the opposite of Communism, which is as far-left as you can get.--Dave3172 23:56, 7 March 2007 (EST)
It should be noted that Nazism is entirely different from Fascism. This article treats both terms as if they're synonymous. - Thjazi