169
edits
Changes
no edit summary
...seriously, I know the tone is flippant, but do keep the subject matter in mind! It's meant to be a little lighthearted. (Also, if anyone knows of a better category to put this in than "Religion," it might go over better!) Also - I know I'm new at this. If I messed up the format and someone catches it, could you please drop me a line to let me know what I did wrong? Thanks! [[User:Pisha|Pisha]] 18:18, 6 July 2007 (EDT)
...seriously, I know the tone is flippant, but do keep the subject matter in mind! It's meant to be a little lighthearted. (Also, if anyone knows of a better category to put this in than "Religion," it might go over better!) Also - I know I'm new at this. If I messed up the format and someone catches it, could you please drop me a line to let me know what I did wrong? Thanks! [[User:Pisha|Pisha]] 18:18, 6 July 2007 (EDT)
:This is supposed to be an encyclopedia-like resource. It's in fact ''not'' meant to be lighthearted ever regardless of subject matter--tone on Conservapedia should always be formal and informative. This article is the antithesis to Conservapedia's mission. -[[User:Ilikecake|Ilikecake]] 21:35, 28 January 2009 (EST)