Difference between revisions of "Talk:Emperor Reigen"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(naming policy for royalty) |
(good idea) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Jessica, I think the Japanese emperors would be more readily recognized if we included their royal title in their article names. So I propose we move [[Reigen]] to [[Emperor Reigen]]; [[Hirohito]] to [[Emperor Hirohito]] and so on. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 07:45, 4 February 2009 (EST) | Jessica, I think the Japanese emperors would be more readily recognized if we included their royal title in their article names. So I propose we move [[Reigen]] to [[Emperor Reigen]]; [[Hirohito]] to [[Emperor Hirohito]] and so on. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 07:45, 4 February 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | :That is probably a good idea; at the moment I only have redirects for the full title. If I remember correctly, moving the article to, say, Emperor Reigen, will automatically leave "Reigen" as a redirect? --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]</sup> 07:59, 4 February 2009 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 12:59, February 4, 2009
Jessica, I think the Japanese emperors would be more readily recognized if we included their royal title in their article names. So I propose we move Reigen to Emperor Reigen; Hirohito to Emperor Hirohito and so on. --Ed Poor Talk 07:45, 4 February 2009 (EST)
- That is probably a good idea; at the moment I only have redirects for the full title. If I remember correctly, moving the article to, say, Emperor Reigen, will automatically leave "Reigen" as a redirect? --KotomiTnandeyanen? 07:59, 4 February 2009 (EST)