Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Ashes"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(It is actually a ball. We have been deceived all these years!)
m
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
Ah! But it would appear as if we have all been misled. According to the ref I added to the article, it says "In 1982 evidence was brought forward suggesting that the Ashes were those of a '''ball''' and were presented to Bligh by Sir William Clarke in a ceremony BEFORE the Test series."
 
Ah! But it would appear as if we have all been misled. According to the ref I added to the article, it says "In 1982 evidence was brought forward suggesting that the Ashes were those of a '''ball''' and were presented to Bligh by Sir William Clarke in a ceremony BEFORE the Test series."
−
Another childhood myth goes down the tubes. --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]</sup> 08:44, 9 February 2009 (EST)
+
Another childhood myth goes down the tubes. --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]</sup> 08:44, 9 February 2009 (EST)

Revision as of 13:45, February 9, 2009

Ball or Bails?

I seem to recall reading that it was the bails of the stumps that were burnt to make the Ashes, not the ball? --KotomiTnandeyanen? 08:14, 9 February 2009 (EST)

Yes, it was indeed the bails, not the ball.

Good catch, KotomiT! Davidklein 08:41, 9 February 2009 (EST)

Ah! But it would appear as if we have all been misled. According to the ref I added to the article, it says "In 1982 evidence was brought forward suggesting that the Ashes were those of a ball and were presented to Bligh by Sir William Clarke in a ceremony BEFORE the Test series." Another childhood myth goes down the tubes. --KotomiTnandeyanen? 08:44, 9 February 2009 (EST)