Difference between revisions of "MediaWiki talk:Ipbreason-dropdown"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Typo: fixed)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
: Yes, but more specific.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:06, 7 October 2008 (EDT)
 
: Yes, but more specific.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:06, 7 October 2008 (EDT)
 
::Ok [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 12:49, 7 October 2008 (EDT)
 
::Ok [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 12:49, 7 October 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
Shouldn't we kill the "Obama" thing now that the article is on lockdown and noone outside of the inner sanctum ''can'' edit it? --[[User:DReynolds|DReynolds]] 22:01, 10 February 2009 (EST)
  
 
==Typo==
 
==Typo==
 
Just wanted you to know of a tiny typo, it should be vulgar instead of vuglar.--jpatt 17:18, 26 November 2008 (EST)
 
Just wanted you to know of a tiny typo, it should be vulgar instead of vuglar.--jpatt 17:18, 26 November 2008 (EST)
 
:Thanks Jp. Fixed. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 23:20, 26 November 2008 (EST)
 
:Thanks Jp. Fixed. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 23:20, 26 November 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 03:01, February 11, 2009

Wouldn't "inappropriate edit to Obama article" fall under "liberal vandalism"? LiamG 11:52, 7 October 2008 (EDT)

Yes, but more specific.--Aschlafly 12:06, 7 October 2008 (EDT)
Ok LiamG 12:49, 7 October 2008 (EDT)

Shouldn't we kill the "Obama" thing now that the article is on lockdown and noone outside of the inner sanctum can edit it? --DReynolds 22:01, 10 February 2009 (EST)

Typo

Just wanted you to know of a tiny typo, it should be vulgar instead of vuglar.--jpatt 17:18, 26 November 2008 (EST)

Thanks Jp. Fixed. --DeanStalk 23:20, 26 November 2008 (EST)