Difference between revisions of "Talk:September 11, 2001 attacks"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Talk:September 11, 2001 attacks moved to Talk:Borf) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | == Rewrite == | |
| + | |||
| + | I'm going to take a swing at this... bear with me. [[User:Myk|Myk]] 02:30, 24 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | :OK, I added a very terse timeline of events sourced from a combination of CNN's timeline and the FBI press release. I just included the key events of what happened... not the response during the day. Selective inclusion of the response could be perceived as partisan and total inclusion of everything... well... that'd be plagiarism. I also gave the most recent estimates for casualties I could find. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I ''did not touch'' the "conspiracy theories" or "events following 9/11" as those are both way too political for liberal old me. My personal opinion is that the "events following" section should be a ''little'' bit more fleshed and written in a more encyclopedic tone... the immediate result was the [[War on Terror]] which has its own article. I also think that the "conspiracy theories" section needs a lot less space but possibly a link to another article. [[User:Myk|Myk]] 04:17, 24 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Oh... and I have some ideas for additional sections which I may tackle unless someone does it first. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *"Economic Impact" | ||
| + | *"Subsequent Health Issues" | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Any others? [[User:Myk|Myk]] 04:32, 24 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 08:32, March 24, 2007
Rewrite
I'm going to take a swing at this... bear with me. Myk 02:30, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
- OK, I added a very terse timeline of events sourced from a combination of CNN's timeline and the FBI press release. I just included the key events of what happened... not the response during the day. Selective inclusion of the response could be perceived as partisan and total inclusion of everything... well... that'd be plagiarism. I also gave the most recent estimates for casualties I could find.
- I did not touch the "conspiracy theories" or "events following 9/11" as those are both way too political for liberal old me. My personal opinion is that the "events following" section should be a little bit more fleshed and written in a more encyclopedic tone... the immediate result was the War on Terror which has its own article. I also think that the "conspiracy theories" section needs a lot less space but possibly a link to another article. Myk 04:17, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
- Oh... and I have some ideas for additional sections which I may tackle unless someone does it first.
- "Economic Impact"
- "Subsequent Health Issues"
- Any others? Myk 04:32, 24 March 2007 (EDT)