Difference between revisions of "User talk:Dorpfeld"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
British cons (talk | contribs) (New page: I have read with some interest your contributions associated with the Arthurian legends. Your knowledge would seem to be to be quite extensive. Indeed, if one reads your entries carefully...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I have read with some interest your contributions associated with the Arthurian legends. Your knowledge would seem to be to be quite extensive. Indeed, if one reads your entries carefully, it is clear that you must have access to sources not available to the rest of mankind. In truth, I think you may have a great future as an author of historical fiction.--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 12:57, 24 March 2007 (EDT) | I have read with some interest your contributions associated with the Arthurian legends. Your knowledge would seem to be to be quite extensive. Indeed, if one reads your entries carefully, it is clear that you must have access to sources not available to the rest of mankind. In truth, I think you may have a great future as an author of historical fiction.--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 12:57, 24 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Most of the stuff comes from ''The Mammoth Book of King Arthur'' by Mike Ashley. [[User:Dorpfeld|Dorpfeld]] 13:05, 24 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 17:05, March 24, 2007
I have read with some interest your contributions associated with the Arthurian legends. Your knowledge would seem to be to be quite extensive. Indeed, if one reads your entries carefully, it is clear that you must have access to sources not available to the rest of mankind. In truth, I think you may have a great future as an author of historical fiction.--British_cons (talk) 12:57, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
- Most of the stuff comes from The Mammoth Book of King Arthur by Mike Ashley. Dorpfeld 13:05, 24 March 2007 (EDT)