Difference between revisions of "Talk:Exact sciences"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:Perhaps it was just a contemporary witnessing of [[adaptation]] - an ability it's designer gave it to deal with differing environmental contexts. --[[User:Qwestor|Qwestor]] <sup>[[User talk:Qwestor|Talk]]</sup> 11:39, 21 February 2009 (EST) | :Perhaps it was just a contemporary witnessing of [[adaptation]] - an ability it's designer gave it to deal with differing environmental contexts. --[[User:Qwestor|Qwestor]] <sup>[[User talk:Qwestor|Talk]]</sup> 11:39, 21 February 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Creation Science== | ||
| + | Though I am a creationist, I would think that creation science should probably go into the same category as evolution, as a fuzzy subject. Anyone else have any thoughts? --[[User:JoshuaStanley|JoshuaStanley]] 22:28, 21 February 2009 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 03:28, February 22, 2009
Witnessing Evolution
Wasn't the whole point of the Lenski Experiment that it provided conclusive evidence of bacteria evolving a useful trait over thousands of generations, and the specimens that inherited the trait thrived compared to those that did not? That would be a contemporary witnessing of evolution, I'd think. --DinsdaleP 10:16, 21 February 2009 (EST)
- By evolution, I mean the theory of evolution through natural selection, which posits that significant new species have come into being without intelligent intervention.
- Whenever we discuss evolution, we need to cut through the mental fog and specify which aspects of evolution we're talking about. Most evolution opponents grant that a species can develop new characteristics in the wild (see microevolution). --Ed Poor Talk 10:26, 21 February 2009 (EST)
- Perhaps it was just a contemporary witnessing of adaptation - an ability it's designer gave it to deal with differing environmental contexts. --Qwestor Talk 11:39, 21 February 2009 (EST)
Creation Science
Though I am a creationist, I would think that creation science should probably go into the same category as evolution, as a fuzzy subject. Anyone else have any thoughts? --JoshuaStanley 22:28, 21 February 2009 (EST)