Difference between revisions of "User talk:RobertWDP"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*Had to <small>(above strike)</small>, Economist, as Mr. Schlafly maintains that will not be our ''emphasis'', insofar as religion goes. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 17:48, 24 February 2009 (EST) | *Had to <small>(above strike)</small>, Economist, as Mr. Schlafly maintains that will not be our ''emphasis'', insofar as religion goes. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 17:48, 24 February 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::My apologies TK; I assumed that Conservapedia's stated POV was similar to that of CreationWiki, which explicitly endorses YEC. I'll keep that in mind. --[[User:Economist|Economist]] 17:55, 24 February 2009 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 22:55, February 24, 2009
Your edits are not primarily "factual;" they take issue with the presentation of the subject, which is based on ideological premises. Note that Conservapedia does not support a Neutral Point of View (NPOV) like Wikipedia does, but rather a conservative, Christian, YEC one. --Economist 17:42, 24 February 2009 (EST)
- Had to (above strike), Economist, as Mr. Schlafly maintains that will not be our emphasis, insofar as religion goes. --₮K/Admin/Talk 17:48, 24 February 2009 (EST)
- My apologies TK; I assumed that Conservapedia's stated POV was similar to that of CreationWiki, which explicitly endorses YEC. I'll keep that in mind. --Economist 17:55, 24 February 2009 (EST)