Difference between revisions of "Talk:Human Immunodeficiency Virus"
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
BTW, Bill, the religion of the scientist is irrelevant, as long as the information is accurate. | BTW, Bill, the religion of the scientist is irrelevant, as long as the information is accurate. | ||
[[User:Palmd001|Palmd001]] 15:32, 17 March 2007 (EDT) | [[User:Palmd001|Palmd001]] 15:32, 17 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | If you wish to discuss fringe theories please feel free to do it here before adding to the article, that way it can be hashed out first. Thanks[[User:Palmd001|Palmd001]] 16:27, 24 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:27, March 24, 2007
Reference section needs to be cleaned up. ColinR 05:55, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
- Entire article could use a little formatting clean-up. ColinR 06:06, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
- This entire article is taken from Wikipedia and contains liberally slanted citations which dangerously and irresponsibly underestimate the transmissability of HIV infection. --BillOReillyFan 22:35, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
Appeal for sources
I've been seeking sources about HIV transmissability from reputable Christian scientists that reflect the true risks unprotected sex. I am completely failing, however. --BillOReillyFan 23:37, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
I will find you statistics. I should have them up soon.
Palmd001 14:50, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
Ok, I added a bunch of transmission risk stats, i hope it's helpful. BTW, Bill, the religion of the scientist is irrelevant, as long as the information is accurate. Palmd001 15:32, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
If you wish to discuss fringe theories please feel free to do it here before adding to the article, that way it can be hashed out first. ThanksPalmd001 16:27, 24 March 2007 (EDT)