Difference between revisions of "Talk:United States Constitution"
Rexislexis (talk | contribs) (Reply to suspicious comment) |
|||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
::You say "copy and paste" is the "only way" to add "significant" (is everything else insignificant?) to the site? Forgive me, but I'm skeptical.--[[User:Rexislexis|Rexislexis]] 00:07, 25 March 2007 (EDT) | ::You say "copy and paste" is the "only way" to add "significant" (is everything else insignificant?) to the site? Forgive me, but I'm skeptical.--[[User:Rexislexis|Rexislexis]] 00:07, 25 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I mentioned the related issue on [[User_talk:Aschlafly/Archive1#Question_about_copying_full_works|this talk page]]. It's apparently here to stay, even though I would back a move of this page to "Full text of the US Constitution" (or something like that) to free up this article for information about it. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 00:08, 25 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 04:08, March 25, 2007
Maybe we should make an article about the Constitution in society and then link to this and call it "Text of the United States Constitution?" --John 14:10, 5 March 2007 (EST)
- I second that. I was not expecting a simple copy and paste when I came to this article.
-Commodore Guff 15:07, 9 March 2007 (EST)
Where's the REST of it?
I'm new here, so I don't have much history as to what is going on, what with edits and such. I'm sure that it's in a working state of development...but ah, where's the rest of the "Full text of the Constitution of the United States"? It's been three months since the page's creation. Thank you. --Cracker
- I put up the Amendments. Someone needs to either tell me how to update the box or update it themselves as it still only shows the original material. Thanks Cracker 13:41, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
- On it. --Sid 3050 13:47, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
- Yeah, thanks. I was refering to the "contents" box. On other wiki's this updates automatically when new headers are added. Are there plans for a "History of the US Constitution"?Cracker 13:58, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
- Done. And it's a manually created ToC as the traditional Wiki one (which I disabled on this page) would be LONG. This is the (in my eyes) best solution that has all the links without being super-huge. --Sid 3050 14:24, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
- Yeah, thanks. I was refering to the "contents" box. On other wiki's this updates automatically when new headers are added. Are there plans for a "History of the US Constitution"?Cracker 13:58, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
- On it. --Sid 3050 13:47, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
This is supposed to be an article *about* the consitution...
This article needs work. It doesn't address the controversial issues at all, or the traditional stance of conservatives on them.
Even if it did, they might get lost behind the full text of the document. The sections of the Constitution should be explained, but this is NOT the place for a massive, unannotated copy of the Constitution. We should simply put a link to the full text.--Rexislexis 23:59, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
- No, large scale verbatim copy and paste of public domain sources is the only way to add significant content to this site. Tmtoulouse 00:00, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
- You say "copy and paste" is the "only way" to add "significant" (is everything else insignificant?) to the site? Forgive me, but I'm skeptical.--Rexislexis 00:07, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
- I mentioned the related issue on this talk page. It's apparently here to stay, even though I would back a move of this page to "Full text of the US Constitution" (or something like that) to free up this article for information about it. --Sid 3050 00:08, 25 March 2007 (EDT)