Difference between revisions of "Personal Attack"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (links)
(They usually indicate a person or group is losing the debate)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
A '''personal attack''' is an insult directed at a specific person. The term personal attack is usually used to describe an irrelevant personal attack, i.e. an attack directed at one person but used against a group to which they belong. Another example of a personal attack would be an [[ad hominem]] attack.
 
A '''personal attack''' is an insult directed at a specific person. The term personal attack is usually used to describe an irrelevant personal attack, i.e. an attack directed at one person but used against a group to which they belong. Another example of a personal attack would be an [[ad hominem]] attack.
−
 
+
:"Personal attacks are difficult and shouldn't occur in a debate in a civilized society. ... They usually indicate a person or group is losing the debate."<ref> [http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/global-warming020507.htm Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts?] Timothy Ball - February 5, 2007</ref>
 
[[category:debate]]
 
[[category:debate]]

Revision as of 20:42, March 21, 2009

A personal attack is an insult directed at a specific person. The term personal attack is usually used to describe an irrelevant personal attack, i.e. an attack directed at one person but used against a group to which they belong. Another example of a personal attack would be an ad hominem attack.

"Personal attacks are difficult and shouldn't occur in a debate in a civilized society. ... They usually indicate a person or group is losing the debate."[1]
  1. ↑ Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts? Timothy Ball - February 5, 2007