Difference between revisions of "Exact sciences"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Conservapedia:Critical Thinking in Math) |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
*[[meteorology]] (especially [[global warming]]) | *[[meteorology]] (especially [[global warming]]) | ||
*[[astronomy]] (especially [[black holes]], the [[Big Bang]] theory) | *[[astronomy]] (especially [[black holes]], the [[Big Bang]] theory) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{reflist}} | ||
[[Category:Science]] | [[Category:Science]] | ||
Revision as of 22:27, March 22, 2009
The exact sciences actually measure what they study, as opposed to the "fuzzy subjects" which mostly engage in uninformed speculation. Evolution is a "fuzzy subject" subject because it cannot be witnessed, but rather is based on secular guesses using existing evidence. Needless to say, exact sciences are far more accurate than fuzzy subjects.
Topics
- mathematics (excepting non-constructive mathematics, like proof by contradiction)[1]
- astronomy
- physics (excepting relativity)
- chemistry
- volcanology
- seismology
- creation science
- baraminology
Fuzzy subjects
- evolution
- paleontology
- linguistics
- psychology
- meteorology (especially global warming)
- astronomy (especially black holes, the Big Bang theory)
References
- ↑ For more discussion, see: Conservapedia:Critical Thinking in Math