Difference between revisions of "Talk:Atheism debates"
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== One-Sided == | == One-Sided == | ||
| − | Is it just me, or was this page made solely to be a one-sided slam against atheist debaters? Nothing is said about the victories of atheist debaters. This needs to be corrected (or deleted, as this article serves almost no purpose, in my opinion). | + | Is it just me, or was this page made solely to be a one-sided slam against atheist debaters? Nothing is said about the victories of atheist debaters. This needs to be corrected (or deleted, as this article serves almost no purpose, in my opinion). [[User:Luminite2|Luminite2]] 11:27, 10 April 2009 (EDT) |
Revision as of 15:27, April 10, 2009
"A press release at the time said that Dr. Martin offered ruses on why he pulled out and didn't want the scheduled debate recorded but the real reason was that [...]" Really? Marvelous speculation on the man's thought processes. Maybe something to the tune of "but Dr. Banshen claims the real reason was [...]" would be better by several orders of magnitude?
On another note, aside from the quotes, this page reeks of bias. I wonder why. Barikada 15:08, 26 January 2008 (EST)
unlock article
unlock this article so I can add a template to it-- 
12:37, 16 May 2008 (EDT)
One-Sided
Is it just me, or was this page made solely to be a one-sided slam against atheist debaters? Nothing is said about the victories of atheist debaters. This needs to be corrected (or deleted, as this article serves almost no purpose, in my opinion). Luminite2 11:27, 10 April 2009 (EDT)