Difference between revisions of "Exact sciences"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(clean up) |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
*[[psychology]] | *[[psychology]] | ||
*[[meteorology]] (especially [[global warming]]) | *[[meteorology]] (especially [[global warming]]) | ||
| − | *[[astronomy]] (especially [[black holes]], the [[Big Bang]] theory) | + | *[[astronomy]] (especially [[black holes]], [[quasar]]s, the [[Big Bang]] theory) |
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 00:50, April 16, 2009
The exact sciences actually measure what they study, as opposed to the "fuzzy subjects" which mostly engage in uninformed speculation. Evolution is a "fuzzy subject" subject because it cannot be witnessed, but rather is based on guesses using presupposed naturalism. Needless to say, exact sciences are far more accurate than fuzzy subjects.
Topics
- mathematics (excepting non-constructive mathematics, like proof by contradiction)[1]
- physics (excepting relativity)
- chemistry
- volcanology
- seismology
- creation science
- baraminology
Fuzzy subjects
- evolution
- paleontology
- linguistics
- psychology
- meteorology (especially global warming)
- astronomy (especially black holes, quasars, the Big Bang theory)
References
- ↑ For more discussion, see: Conservapedia:Critical Thinking in Math