Difference between revisions of "Debate:Epicurus' Trilemma"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with 'The trilemma is: In most Christian religions, "God" is portrayed as omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent. HOWEVER, 1) If "God" is willing but not able to prevent evil, he/s...') |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{debate}} | ||
The trilemma is: | The trilemma is: | ||
In most Christian religions, "God" is portrayed as omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent. HOWEVER, | In most Christian religions, "God" is portrayed as omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent. HOWEVER, | ||
Revision as of 23:42, April 16, 2009
| ! | THIS IS A DEBATE PAGE, NOT AN ARTICLE. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of Conservapedia. Your opinion is welcome! Please remember to sign your comments on this page, and refrain from editing other user's contributions. New Users: Please read our "Editing etiquette" before posting |
The trilemma is: In most Christian religions, "God" is portrayed as omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent. HOWEVER, 1) If "God" is willing but not able to prevent evil, he/she/it is not omnipotent. 2) If "God" is able but not willing to prevent evil, he/she/it is not good. 3) If "God" is able and willing to prevent evil, then why is there evil?
I saw it somewhere, but I don't understand what it means.