Difference between revisions of "Talk:Roman Catholics"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Tpleighton (talk | contribs) |
Sevenstring (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The article about Roman Catholicism is quite biased. It does not expound upon any of the aspects of The Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church nor does it contain any information about its dogma or its organization. Instead it implies that it is a false religion. If this is indicative of the quality of articles on Conservapedia then the project is at best third rate. | The article about Roman Catholicism is quite biased. It does not expound upon any of the aspects of The Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church nor does it contain any information about its dogma or its organization. Instead it implies that it is a false religion. If this is indicative of the quality of articles on Conservapedia then the project is at best third rate. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | I agree - move it and deep-six the anti-Catholic tripe that filled this page up. -Sevenstring | ||
Latest revision as of 22:32, March 25, 2007
The article about Roman Catholicism is quite biased. It does not expound upon any of the aspects of The Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church nor does it contain any information about its dogma or its organization. Instead it implies that it is a false religion. If this is indicative of the quality of articles on Conservapedia then the project is at best third rate.
I agree - move it and deep-six the anti-Catholic tripe that filled this page up. -Sevenstring