Difference between revisions of "Talk:Derogatory terms"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(2 questions for improvement)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
I think this article could benefit more from someone who has taken a higher level political science course (only field I can think of that would even come close to seriously investigating this subject, though I suspect it would not be in a direct way) so that they may add a more detailed analysis (they would also have more access to sources) on the subject, provide additional examples, and perhaps add more historical context. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 14:20, 25 August 2008 (EDT)
 
I think this article could benefit more from someone who has taken a higher level political science course (only field I can think of that would even come close to seriously investigating this subject, though I suspect it would not be in a direct way) so that they may add a more detailed analysis (they would also have more access to sources) on the subject, provide additional examples, and perhaps add more historical context. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 14:20, 25 August 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Who's talking about whom?==
 +
 +
We need to indicate which group is "demonizing" what other group? Who's doing the labeling? Better still, give their reasoning.
 +
 +
And what about words like [[hippie]] which were self-applied? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 15:58, 21 April 2009 (EDT)

Revision as of 19:58, April 21, 2009

Should mention how the word 'liberal' has become demonizing. Also, why should this article only be about liberal demonizers? I have heard many a conservative demonizers like "tree-hugger" and "evolutionist" (it and the word 'creationist' have too many mean spirited implications when applied to a person).--Snotbowst 19:35, 15 May 2008 (EDT)

Anyone here a college student?

I think this article could benefit more from someone who has taken a higher level political science course (only field I can think of that would even come close to seriously investigating this subject, though I suspect it would not be in a direct way) so that they may add a more detailed analysis (they would also have more access to sources) on the subject, provide additional examples, and perhaps add more historical context. Jirby 14:20, 25 August 2008 (EDT)

Who's talking about whom?

We need to indicate which group is "demonizing" what other group? Who's doing the labeling? Better still, give their reasoning.

And what about words like hippie which were self-applied? --Ed Poor Talk 15:58, 21 April 2009 (EDT)