Difference between revisions of "MediaWiki talk:Ipbreason-dropdown"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(recent undo does not make sense)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
Just wanted you to know of a tiny typo, it should be vulgar instead of vuglar.--jpatt 17:18, 26 November 2008 (EST)
 
Just wanted you to know of a tiny typo, it should be vulgar instead of vuglar.--jpatt 17:18, 26 November 2008 (EST)
 
:Thanks Jp. Fixed. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 23:20, 26 November 2008 (EST)
 
:Thanks Jp. Fixed. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 23:20, 26 November 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
== Recent undo ==
 +
 +
It is irritating navigating through 35 block reasons, while some points are almost equal to others. [[User:Jallen|Jallen]] 21:17, 29 April 2009 (EDT)

Revision as of 01:17, April 30, 2009

Wouldn't "inappropriate edit to Obama article" fall under "liberal vandalism"? LiamG 11:52, 7 October 2008 (EDT)

Yes, but more specific.--Aschlafly 12:06, 7 October 2008 (EDT)
Ok LiamG 12:49, 7 October 2008 (EDT)

Shouldn't we kill the "Obama" thing now that the article is on lockdown and noone outside of the inner sanctum can edit it? --DReynolds 22:01, 10 February 2009 (EST)

Typo

Just wanted you to know of a tiny typo, it should be vulgar instead of vuglar.--jpatt 17:18, 26 November 2008 (EST)

Thanks Jp. Fixed. --DeanStalk 23:20, 26 November 2008 (EST)

Recent undo

It is irritating navigating through 35 block reasons, while some points are almost equal to others. Jallen 21:17, 29 April 2009 (EDT)