Difference between revisions of "Creation science"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (fixed beginning of entry) |
(This should at least clarify the point of mentioning the survey.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
| − | '''Creation science''' is an effort to show that scientific evidence is consistent with the account of Creation in the Bible and not with the [[Theory of evolution|theory of evolution]]. Creation science is not accepted by most scientists. However, | + | '''Creation science''' is an effort to show that scientific evidence is consistent with the account of Creation in the Bible and not with the [[Theory of evolution|theory of evolution]]. Creation science is not accepted by most scientists. However, this could be due partly to the religious views of the scientists, rather than scientific evidences. A poll among United States scientists showed approximately 45% of scientists believed there was no God.[http://www.ovpr.uga.edu/researchnews/97su/faith.html] In addition, a survey found that 93% of the scientists who were members of the [[United States National Academy of Sciences]] do not believe there is a God. [http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v394/n6691/full/394313a0.html] |
Revision as of 03:51, March 26, 2007
Creation science is an effort to show that scientific evidence is consistent with the account of Creation in the Bible and not with the theory of evolution. Creation science is not accepted by most scientists. However, this could be due partly to the religious views of the scientists, rather than scientific evidences. A poll among United States scientists showed approximately 45% of scientists believed there was no God.[1] In addition, a survey found that 93% of the scientists who were members of the United States National Academy of Sciences do not believe there is a God. [2]