2,002
edits
Changes
→References
*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A.N.S.W.E.R.
*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A.N.S.W.E.R.
:According to Wikipedia, "ANSWER was one of several groups organizing the U.S. component of the worldwide February 15, 2003 anti-war protest, which was, across the globe, the largest anti-war rally that has ever taken place.[1] ANSWER sponsored emergency demonstrations just before the launch of the U.S. invasion of Iraq, on March 15, 2003, which according to its website drew 100,000 people each in San Francisco and Washington. "
:According to Wikipedia, "ANSWER was one of several groups organizing the U.S. component of the worldwide February 15, 2003 anti-war protest, which was, across the globe, the largest anti-war rally that has ever taken place.[1] ANSWER sponsored emergency demonstrations just before the launch of the U.S. invasion of Iraq, on March 15, 2003, which according to its website drew 100,000 people each in San Francisco and Washington. "
:: Two problems with these links. 1) Many antiwar protester were liberal, indeed, but many weren't. Just because most weren't conservative doesn't mean that they were automatically liberal. 2) Many liberals were supporting the invasion of Iraq, because they believed it would advance human rights and democracry. Conclusion: War protestors '''not equal too''' liberals. [[User:Order]]
*[http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0118-03.htm This Looming War Isn't About Chemical Warheads or Human Rights: It's About Oil], Robert Fisk, January 18, 2003, The Independent.
*[http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0118-03.htm This Looming War Isn't About Chemical Warheads or Human Rights: It's About Oil], Robert Fisk, January 18, 2003, The Independent.
:Robert Fisk has twice interviewed bin Laden, and the earlier interview is incomplete in all internet versions, if memory serves me.
:Robert Fisk has twice interviewed bin Laden, and the earlier interview is incomplete in all internet versions, if memory serves me.
::This article is not opposing foreign policy advancing human rights, it is opposing foreign policy which the article calims is to advance oil interests, dressed up as advancing human rights. That is Fisk's point, like it or not. [[User:Order]]
===Discussion===
===Discussion===
Let's examine footnote 2, ''"The 'Answer' Question Poses Difficult Choices for Liberals"'', extract:
Let's examine footnote 2, ''"The 'Answer' Question Poses Difficult Choices for Liberals"'', extract: