2,002
edits
Changes
→Discussion
::This makes no sense. Sr. Bush was reponsible for Tiananmen? Lame excuse and irrelevent for '''the fact''' that the heart and soul of this "liberal" anti-war movement today (a) was anti-democratic in the Tainanmen massacre and other occasions; (b) accepted human rights abuses as part of its program. And a further point, the founders and leaders of the current anti-war movement ''also'' are known for thier anti-Semitic views--a fact which reared its head again last election season among ''other'' liberals not associated with ANSWER. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 01:00, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
::This makes no sense. Sr. Bush was reponsible for Tiananmen? Lame excuse and irrelevent for '''the fact''' that the heart and soul of this "liberal" anti-war movement today (a) was anti-democratic in the Tainanmen massacre and other occasions; (b) accepted human rights abuses as part of its program. And a further point, the founders and leaders of the current anti-war movement ''also'' are known for thier anti-Semitic views--a fact which reared its head again last election season among ''other'' liberals not associated with ANSWER. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 01:00, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
:::The chinese government was responsible for Tienanmen. You blame liberal for complicity in the Tienanmen massrce, so when you cast the ball, expect it to return. [User:Order]] 26 March 15:30 (AEST)
[[User:Order]] stated, ''interventionist foreign policies that involves nation building''; can we say then Liberals oppose intervention and nation building in Durfur, and President Clinton had nothing to appologize for regarding Rwanda? [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:58, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
[[User:Order]] stated, ''interventionist foreign policies that involves nation building''; can we say then Liberals oppose intervention and nation building in Durfur, and President Clinton had nothing to appologize for regarding Rwanda? [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:58, 25 March 2007 (EDT)